dorislessing.jpg

The Nobel Prize for Literature goes to Doris Lessing, “that epicist of the female experience, who with scepticism, fire and visionary power has subjected a divided civilisation to scrutiny.”

At 88, Lessing is 10 years older than Milan Kundera and 20 years older than Margaret Atwood, both of whom I thought had a chance. 14 years older than “snubbed” Philip Roth, 11 years older than Chinua Achebe. And a full 30 years older than Haruki Murakami. All these kids can get the prize some other year.

In other enormous book prize news, the National Book Award nominees have been announced. Kind of cool that Denis Johnson’s voluminous Tree of Smoke is up against Lydia Davis’ minimalist Varieties of Disturbance.

orhan pamuk

Last year’s Nobel Laureate in Literature, Orhan Pamuk, read in Pittsburgh just as this year’s Nobels began trickling out.

“I write because I can only participate in real life by changing it,” he read from Other Colors, his new collection of (mostly) nonfiction, a sort of autobiography. In that essay, he writes several times that he is angry, “angry at all of you.” But he was relaxed, joking, funny on stage. Someone asked how he could be angry while also being playful, as the NY Times described him.

“I am a playful author, obviously,” Pamuk said, “But that doesn’t stop me from being an angry man.”

He also read from My Name is Red, prefacing the excerpt by talking about his upbringing. “I wanted to be a painter between the ages of 7 and 22,” but he came from a long line of engineers, who suggested, “Perhaps this one should study architecture — isn’t that artsy engineering?”

I’m glad he ditched the architecture.

george saunders

Yesterday Pittsburgh became George Saundersland, with a lunch, a Q&A session, a (rumored) dinner with faculty, and a reading (pictured) at the Frick Fine Arts auditorium. Trust me, that figure at the mic is George Saunders.

Since the students were too shy to venture many questions, the Q & A session was mostly A. Highlights?

George Saunders: Teaching writing and talking about it has got a kind of high bullshit quotient.

George Saunders on drafts: What comes out in a first draft isn’t really you.

George Saunders on revision: If I’m looking at a piece of prose and I know my main job is to compress it, that gets me excited.

George Saunders on voice: I was trying to find a voice that would respond to my world, rather than the other way around.

George Saunders on his early writing: If anyone had read the essay before the one that got me into the MFA program at Syracuse, they would have said, ‘You’re like Somerset Maugham on quaaludes — and it’s 1985.’

There was more, of course, but I’d get sucked in by what he was saying and then lose track of the notes I was taking. He spoke quite a bit about revision — a first draft isn’t you because your true voice is hidden by a lot of writerly stuff (oh, I’m paraphrasing terribly). He gave us a funny example that began with “John walked into the well-appointed living room and sat down on the yellow couch” — why well-appointed? he asked. What year is this? Then, why walked in? It’s the beginning of your story – so John’s just now appeared on the page. If walking in isn’t important to the story, cut it. By the end of his example, he’d killed everything but “John.” (too bad, I really liked the yellow couch).

It had been a long day; several of us grad students decided to go get a drink after Saunders’ reading and signing. And then, he joined us at the bar.

I know it’s too much to say that it was the platonic ideal of a writer’s visit, but it kind of was. Ideal.

mark z danielewski

Mark Z. Danielewski read from both House of Leaves and his latest, Only Revolutions, at Joseph-Beth Booksellers last night in Pittsburgh. I’d put the crowd at 100+, and every single person stood in line to get books signed. Which was worth it, because Danielewski used brightly colored pens and personalized each autograph. Cool.

The Q&A session had a few clunkers, including a question about how to get famous authors to blurb your publish-on-demand book (huh?). But a few weren’t so bad.

Q: How do you describe House of Leaves to people?
MZD: It’s a story about a family that moves into a house that’s bigger on the inside than on the outside.

on the genesis of House of Leaves -
MZD: It’s how I see the world. I see stories as a compilation of narratives and viewpoints.

on what publishers want -
MZD: All they want is something that’s done, that they can put a piece of cardboard on, and a barcode.

on literary criticism about his work (like Writing Machines) -
MZD: The reality is, most of it’s right, in my experience. Very smart people are spending a lot of time digesting, analyzing these texts. It’s interesting how much of it is spot-on.

on writing -
MZD: I like to write. I like to sit down and talk to my gorillas.

faulkner outline

The legend goes like this: Faulkner outlined his book A Fable on the walls of his office. Apparently, this didn’t fit with his wife’s idea of proper decor; she painted over it. Faulkner then re-outlined the story — climbing up on his desk or something because he was about Picasso’s height and those notes are way up by the ceiling — and shellacked the wall so his outline would be there for good.

Which all goes to show that William Faulkner thought outlines were important.

And he was probably impossible to live with.

Faulkner’s home, Rowan Oak, is now a museum. Which can be toured even if you’re not headed to Oxford, Mississippi. (via)

Did New York Magazine think it was starting a meme when it ranked Delillo works? Well, it’s quacking like a meme. Ed Park picked it up first with his excellent take. His ranking goes, from best to less-best:

The Names
Amazons
Americana
Ratner’s Star
White Noise

—-
“Pafko at the Wall”
Running Dog
Great Jones Street

—-
Underworld
End Zone
Mao II
Libra
Players


Game Six (screenplay), Three Plays, Valparaiso, The Day Room, Love-Lies-Bleeding
—-
Cosmopolis
The Body Artist

What is it about Delillo readers that makes us completists? And shame on not-quite-completist me for being clueless, until this moment, about Amazons. Anyway, my take on the works of Don Delillo:

THE BEST
Underworld. So superb, after he’d been away so long. The first 50 pages — prologue, “Pafko at the Wall,” what-have-you — stunning. The polished, complete version of what he’d been working on in bits and pieces for years, all in one great novel.

Ratner’s Star. Science fiction with a protagonist whose name is ripped from Joyce. Brilliant men retreat to holes, eat worms, contemplate the screaming beauty of math and the stars. Did I mention it’s funny? Each time I force this book on someone I regret it, because it never comes back. I buy it again and again.

Great Jones Street. I love rock and roll. I love that Delillo’s imagined Jim Morrison could just as easily be Kurt Cobain or the next generation of rock star desperate for anonymity. I love that I have a first edition hardback of this, dust jacket and all.

EXCELLENT
Libra. History and truth. Delillo steps into the middle of the morass of conflicting Kennedy assassination accounts and tells a fiction that somehow trumps them all.

The Names. Not fun, by any stretch. While Delillo’s writing is often, at some level, about language, here he runs headlong at language with fiction, which is sort of like trying to peer at your own retina. Time for me to revisit it — maybe, now that I’ve dosed on semiotics and deconstructionism, it won’t be so impenetrable.

VERY GOOD
Mao II and The Players. These have gone vague, but at least they were kind of romp-ish. Fame and belief and terrorism and sex, if I recall.

Americana. Delillo’s first book is massive, funny, wicked, smart and also cumbersome, awkwardly paced and untrimmed. It’s the author as novice, and a fabulous way to see some of his artifice exposed. It feels like he’s trying to do Underworld but hasn’t quite developed the chops. Yet.

End Zone and Running Dog. Consumed in a fit of Delillo fandom, went down easy.

The Body Artist. Beautiful and full of pain and mourning. Almost undoes itself with silence (it’s a very slight book). An inexpressible grief.

ALAS
Cosmopolis. Ouch. Strangely cringeworthy.

WHY DO PEOPLE KNOW THIS BOOK? I’LL TELL YOU WHY.
White Noise. Oh, is the narrator a college professor? Who puts it on their syllabi? That’s right: college professors! It’s not the narcissim alone, it’s that there are so many others they might pick. So the students read it, and there you go: they think Delillo writes about college professors. Grumble.

And on to Falling Man. Since Mao II, I’ve bought each new Delillo in hardcover, and I don’t see any reason to stop. I like what I’ve read so far.

But as the bookstores around here are closed this time of night, I’ve gotten The Names down off the shelf.

The green room, LA Times Festival of Books: Nobel prizewinner Eric Kandell wears a red bowtie; Tim Gunn is immaculate in a navy suit. Michael Connoly sits shyly in a corner; Coe Booth takes a patio table in the sun. Reza Aslan is at the center of a large circle of admirers. James Ellroy is tall as always, but thinner than he used to be. Tina Louise has written a children’s book; her hair is red, but not as red as it used to be when she was Ginger.

With any luck, I’ll be able to blog today from the festival.

Meanwhile:
- YA stars
- first novels panel & more
- Charles Phoenix
- tips for surviving the festival
- a mystery fan reports
- a right-wing take on yesterday’s blogging panel
- a report with photos

And Dave Bullock is taking amazing photos of Coachella. Almost like being there.

David Halberstam died yesterday in a California car crash.

What with him and Vonnegut going, luminous American writers — particularly those with a skeptical perspective on war — should be very, very careful.

Litbloggers keep cropping up in newspapers. This week: Ed Champion profiles Lionel Shriver for the Chicago Sun-Times and Mark Sarvas makes his NY Times debut with a review of James Wilcox’s Hunk City. Congrats, gentlemen!

Salvadoran Horacio Castellanos Moya has been selected for the two-year City of Asylum residency in Pittsburgh. From the (pdf) press release:

Born in 1957, Castellanos Moya is the author of eight novels, five short story collec-tions and one book of essays. He studied history and literature at the University of El Salvador and at York University in Toronto, Canada, and worked as a journalist in Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala. As editor-in-chief of the weekly independent newspaper Primera Plana, he investigated links between El Salvador’s political and military rightist leaders and organized crime. In 1997, Castellanos Moya published El Asco: Thomas Bernhard en San Salvador, a novel exposing the political crimes of the ruling forces, including the murder of Archbishop Oscar Romero, and criticizing sensitive political and cultural aspects of Salvadoran life. As a result, he received anonymous death threats and fearing for his life, went into exile.

Moya will be teaching a readings course at Pitt next fall, tentatively titled “Latin American Literature: Post Magical-Realism.” Which (damn!) conflicts with my schedule.

© 2010 carolyn kellogg Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha