Last week The Paris Review posted my Culture Diary on their blog — parts one and two — which proves that as an LA-based bookish reporter I sometimes get up outrageously early, and that really most everything I do these days seems to be around books. (I went to LCD Soundsystem at the Hollywood Bowl! I swear!)

The picture above isn’t from that week: it’s from the LA Archives Bazaar, which was held Saturday morning at USC. Close to 80 local archives (!) had tables set up in the Doheny Library reading room. There were also panels and discussions, but I was covering the Beverly Hills Literary Escape most of the weekend, and didn’t have time to linger. Instead, I gathered up flyers from places like the Metro Dorothy Peyton Gray Library & Archive (transportation research) and for events like the Sixth Annual Kenneth Karmiole Lecture on the History of the Book Trade – Bankruptcy and the Eighteenth Century Book Trade, a lecture at the Willam Andrews Clark Memorial Library (I’m SO going to that. I’m not kidding).

It was nice to see the reading room buzzing again. A zillion years ago, when I went to USC — and when I was a dropout who haunted the library — I’d read there sometimes. Last year, though, I was on campus and stuck my head in, and it was cavernously empty. It made me wonder how well the space gets used, now that students can do so much research (not all!) on the internet. Doheny is beautiful, though — if the students don’t want to use it, this alumna would be happy to take up a corner reading.

Malcolm Gladwell reviews Chris Anderson’s Free in this week’s New Yorker — I wrote about the dust-up surrounding uncredited passages in the book and what the implications of Anderson’s error might be in the LA Times, so I was curious. I think Gladwell brings up many good questions about Anderson’s thesis — that as stuff becomes close enough to free to round down, our economy is changing.

He’s correct in saying he that the end cost of a product is only partially the product itself — that distribution, execution and other expenses make up the bulk of the cost.

But he’s not correct in implying, then, that things aren’t free. Just because it’s expensive to produce something — a specialized drug — doesn’t mean that the cost will be passed on to the buyer.

Take, for example, the music industry and journalism, two things I know a bit about. Whether it’s the millions it takes to put Metallica on CD or a couple hundred bucks in home recording, songs can be copied and recirculated for free. And the LA Times can be accessed online for free, no subscription necessary. It’s not that songs or newspapers are free to produce — they’re not — but they are free to acquire.

In Gladwell’s drug example, he concludes, “In this case, information does not want to be free.* It wants to be really, really expensive.” But what information wants is not necessarily what information gets. Metallica does not want you to download their music without buying it. But the expectations of Free aren’t dictated by information, or Metallica, or the producer of a drug — they’re from the um, purchasers — people who know that Free is possible, and will continue to choose it first over notfree.

* The phrase “information wants to be free” came from Stewart Brand in the 1980s. It was remixed a few times, but each time he said or wrote it, it was paired with the idea that information also wants to be expensive. Sometimes, when people argue against “information wants to be free,” they overlook the fact that this free-expensive duality was part of the statement in the first place.

That’s the picture. It can be found here, on Jacket Copy. It can also be found here, on the bozo’s website. Click to see the bozo’s version big, which shows how yes, the clouds and reflections are exactly the same.

Not that I am surprised some bozo runs around using other people’s photos. It’s what bloggers are accused of — irresponsibility, lack of journalistic ethics, deliberate un-awareness that people gots to get paid for their work. Or, at the very least, given credit. I’m all for Creative Commons. I let people use my pictures all the time — for free, but with credit. Think about it, bozo: did I drive out to Book Soup last Sunday for you? No, I did not. The picture is not yours.

What really galls me is that this pic ends up on LAist — credited to the bozo. LAist — where I WAS EDITOR — get the whole blogging thing. They provide photo credit. To, unfortunately, the bozo, who does not.

Emily Gould, onetime Gawker turned publishing industry blogger, has left Galleycat. Her tenure at the site began two months and six days ago.

Emily Gould’s first Galleycat post; her last Galleycat post; and that little New York Times Magazine cover story she had published in between.

tony pierce

Tony Pierce, the enthusiastic, wild, obsessive, peerless* editor of LAist is moving on to manage the blogs of the Los Angeles Times.

Congratulations, Tony!

Photo: That’s Tony in the center, mid-Skooby’s hot dog, telling Rob Takata and Cecil Castellucci what’s what.

* not predecessor-less, though: his predecessor was me.

The New York Times has printed 100 Notable Books for 2007. I’ve read 5, including Ian MacEwan’s slender On Chesil Beach, the hefty Tree of Smoke by Denis Johnson, and Don Delillo’s midsized Falling Man. The others, I’ve both read and reviewed — Twenty Grand by Rebecca Curtis and The Abstinence Teacher by Tom Perrotta.

There are several others that are in my to-be-read pile or wish-I-owned hypothetical pile or started-but-haven’t finished pile. And I’m not the only one.

What’s funny is that the NY Times only includes books on its list which it deigned to review in the first place. The paper didn’t look beyond its own review pool to consider books that might be “notable.”

© 2010 carolyn kellogg Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha