My review of Jonathan Ames’ The Double Life is Twice As Good is in today’s LA Times books pages. The book is not so great, and I couldn’t help but think that his publisher wanted to have an Ames collection on shelves which included the story “Bored to Death” by the time the HBO series based on it (starring Jason Schwatrzman) premieres this fall. Not only to the pieces fail to say much of anything, but old diary entries and an email are included — filler-style odds and ends. I wish the book had been great; Ames generously gave me an interview when I was a struggling podcaster, and was very kind, too. Such is the sucky job of a critic, though: you’ve got to be critical.

On another note, I got to talk about works-after-death for an article that appears in today’s Observer. There’s a major upcoming release by Nabakov (the long-secreted The Original of Laura), a re-do of Hemingway’s A Movable Feast, and a few others, including Graham Greene’s first (unfinished) novel. The Strand Magazine gave Jacket Copy a peek at Graham Greene’s effort — sort of an Agatha Christie knock-off — and I got to chime in about what the dead-guy-book pile-on means.

The fourth of July BBQ I could walk to was too good to pass up. At not quite two miles away, and up a dusty trail through a park, many Angelenos would not consider this walkable, but I was determined. When it came to picking out shoes, I wavered, and I was not super-cutely attired — indeed, I was sweaty and winded — when I arrived, but there you go. I’d walked.

Of course, I mooched a ride home.

But before that it was a lovely BBQ, with lots of food and drink and 3 year-olds the size of 5 year-olds careening around, not at all in control of their ever-growing limbs. We sat on a large patio, watching the sun go down and sparks of fireworks rise up along the horizon.

Where I live, I am hemmed in with no view, but it’s easy enough to find one if you hike up a steep hill.

I’d been there once before, at this home of a longtime acquaintance, when it was full of stuff. Yesterday the stuff was there but pushed away, tidied, and I took the time to appreciate the off-kilter rectangle-ness of the space, the wall of windows, the studio-type floor, the rock fireplace and short rock wall with a square velvet couch that seemed built for its spot, a bedroom that was a just a nook with a wide open wall to the rest of the space. There was another part of the house I hadn’t seen, a roommate, a kitchen, but I stood there thinking that this was the way to do it right, to create the open space and the windows over the trees and the big wide patio and the space to work in. I just kind of stood there taking it in.

The place is really great, I told my longtime acquaintance, who was cranking the windows open, or shut. How did you find it? Well, someone they knew was working on a Schindler documentary, and there was this house…

This is a Schindler house? I asked.

Yes, they said.

Oh, I didn’t say. Wow, I didn’t say. I was just quiet, which for me is saying both those things, really.

I thought of other places of sublime, out-of-reach beauty. Like Frank Lloyd Wright’s Falling Water, or those Newport mansions I grew up close to, or the houses in Malibu I drove past on Thursday. Every time I’d seen one of those places I’d imagined what it would be like to live in them, to have that as the texture of your life, every day. How the physical space would be a like a gift that would secretly inform your actions, even when you stopped noticing it, if you could ever stop noticing it.

And here I was, in a place like this not as a museum but as a place where someone — not rich — lived for real, who made potato salad and drank tequila. I felt fortunate to have used this bathroom and seen this view and done ordinary things like help string the christmas lights and neglect to carry food back to the kitchen. I could have driven someplace else and I would have missed it; but yesterday, the sublimity of that Schindler house was the texture of my life, too.

Shortly after getting up I checked my Twitter feed — a weakness, to be sure — and saw that Alain de Botton was Tweeting quotes about anger. Here’s one:

Angry people call poverty on themselves and ruin on their homes, denying they are angry, just as the mad deny their insanity, Seneca -De Ira

de Botton — who is @alaindebotton, if you’re curious — had recently left an angry comment on the blog of Caleb Crain, who (negatively) reviewed de Botton’s book “The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work” in the NY Times. “You have now killed my book in the United States, nothing short of that,” de Botton wrote. “So that’s two years of work down the drain in one miserable 900 word review…. I will hate you till the day I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make. I will be watching with interest and schadenfreude.”

Which is heated, if not nasty. And it doesn’t fit with the Alain de Botton I saw at the Getty in LA just a few weeks ago, who came across as sweet and patient. He stood for hours on a chilly patio in order to speak to every person who wanted a book signed; it was a long queue at the end of his book tour, but he never got frustrated or exasperated.

So he’s either good at fronting, or Crain really pissed him off.

I’m inclined to think the latter, and I’m glad that de Botton said what he said. Not that I hate the review, am convinced this is de Botton’s best work or am even sure that he’s right about the damage done — but I think expressing anger is OK. Don’t like the review — say something! Such reactions shouldn’t leave reviewers cowering, but get them up on their feet, shouting their opinions, their reasons, their refusals to submit!

There is some kind of play-nice mentality going around that I’m not sure I believe in. Maybe we’ve lost our ability to argue without getting personal, or the skill of expressing anger with eloquence. I think that’s why de Botton was pulling what 140-character quotes he could about anger’s place in our lives.

That said, I’m not sure that going to Nietzche on how to live is ever a good idea.

The emotions of envy, hatred and lust are life-conditioning emotions which must essentially be present in every life – Nietzsche

It’s not untrue, but it feels uneasy, unresolved. Nietzche is good for some things — he’s always thought provoking, if not infuriating — but his ego-driven, brittle intellect didn’t make him much of a life coach.

I’ve been puzzled by exactly what to do here on my personal blog. I used to write about books, but now I write about books on Jacket Copy. I write a second blog for the LA Times, which is kind of technology-green-hipster-culture, which covers a lot of stuff of other than books. And I do some other work that, when I began, I was asked not to discuss online.

So if I’m not writing about books (which I love), or contemporary culture (which I like), or the other stuff I’m doing (which is mine), what do I write about? Since I Twitter, what’s the point of blogging, anyway?

Some people use blogs to vent bile. Throw mud. I’m torn. Do I throw mud back at the person who threw it at me last week? Do I point out inaccuracies, exaggerations, and reveal the short and rather pathetic backstory?

Meh.

I will tell you this: in my new rental, which is sandwiched between an apartment building full of gang kids and one of LA’s most beautiful residential streets, I can hear birds singing in the morning, and have tried to to save a fledgling from the neighborhood cats.

People came over to see this new place this weekend. It’s like you, they said. But my last place — a tall 1920s brick apartment building with a chilly pool and a bar on the ground floor was like me, too.

I think I’ve fooled them into thinking any place is like me by filling them all full of books.

Currently reading: a book for review & Jonathan Lethem’s Chronic City for fun.

The Southern California chapter of the Mystery Writers of America invited me and Kassia Krozier and Lise Friedman, field rep for Macmillan, to talk about the future of publishing at a brunch today. Denise Hamilton, our moderator, steered us toward talking about how authors can navigate the world of new media, which was a little more manageable than trying to predict the future. Although on that front, Kassia was all pro-ebook and I was pro-paper, in case you were wondering. Everyone was awfully nice, and the brunch, at The Smoke House, a 1940s-era restaurant that I was sadly ignorant of (such is my unfamiliarity with the Valley), was entirely delicious, if you skipped the sushi.

While I was getting a churro and dipping strawberries in the chocolate fountain, Andrew Sullivan found a post of mine on Jacket Copy that struck a chord. Thanks for the link, big guy.

Being on twitter right now feels like passing notes in the class of life.

I’m sure someone else has already said that.

And it won’t stay that way for long. I mention Mad Men and hours later Betty Draper is following me. Betty? If I have to be followed by a television character, could we make it Don Draper, please?

On Thursday night I went to see Ben Ehrenriech and Etgar Keret at the LA Public Library’s ALOUD series. They were in conversation with the topic, “Is reality overrated”? Easy to answer in a month when stock markets around the world have tanked, yadda yadda. Surreality, it was easily agreed, is much better.

“The times are very difficult to live in, but easy to write about.” That was Keret. I think he was quoting, or paraphrasing someone. But he said many insightful and funny things of his own. Describing overly-perfect art versus messy genius, he described Bob Dylan’s voice as that of “a choking crow” — but you’d still rather hear it than an American Idol contestant’s pitch-perfect cover.

Someone asked Keret a question that I sounded pretty dumb: since he’d written about suicide (his story “Kneller’s Happy Campers” was the basis for the film Wristcutters), did he have any personal experience with it? Geez, I thought, fiction means it’s made up. But I was wrong.

“My best friend killed himself during Army service,” Keret said. People who know his biography have probably heard this before, but it was news to me. They’d stay up late nights talking about life and whether it was worth living, then his friend decided it wasn’t. “Writing for me,” Keret said, “is the answer for why I’m living.”

I did take pictures. But I can’t find the cable that connects my camera to my computer.

Instead of Etgar Keret and Ben Ehrenreich, I’ve got a picture above of an orchid in my father’s Florida greenhouse. I can never remember which is what — this one might be a paphiopedalum. If it isn’t, it’s a good word, anwyay: Paphiopedalum.

Good words. Reasons for living.

From the front page of the NY Times, right now:

Magazine Preview
The Affluencer
By SUSAN DOMINUS
Lauren Zalaznick, the head of the Bravo network, has taken her own elite, urban, downtown sensibilities and brought it into America’s living rooms.

I guess it’s ok to say that Bravo is an it.

But sensibilities — no matter how elite, urban or downtown they might be — are not it at all.

A new study of 18-34 year-old males by Hall and Partners for Break Media shows that while new media is an essential part of young men’s lives, books are still in the running. 69 percent of the 500 men surveyed said they could not live without the Internet. Every week guys spend a lot of time staring at screens — they’re text messaging (66 percent are), visiting social networking sites (63 percent) and playing video games (60 percent). But 46 percent of them turn their attention away from the glare to read a book. 46 percent read books — I agree with Matt Staggs, that sounds pretty good.

Until you revisit the good old NEA reports. “To Read or Not to Read” (2007) and its predecessor, “Reading at Risk” (2004) cited drastic declines in reading culture across many demographics. From 1992 to 2002, the percentage of 18-24 year old Americans (not just guys) who read a book that was not required for work or school dropped 12 percent, more than any other group. 25-34 year olds were not far behind, with an 8 percent drop. The “low” numbers that were reached: for 18-24 year olds, only 52 percent read for leisure; with 25-34 year olds, it was 59 percent.

I know the samples are different, that boys are lumped with girls, that the age groups are broken down in one survey and not in the other, and nobody asked the first group whether they were reading those books just for fun or because they had to. But even with all those mystery factors, 46 percent reading is still a smaller percentage than 52 or 59 percent. In other words, 46 percent isn’t so good after all.

But maybe there is hope. The Hall and Partners report is really focused on the online activities and proclivities of young men, who, when it comes to advertising, apparently like funny videos more than anything else. They make several recommendations for online advertisers, and so I share this here. Publishers, take note.

Brands looking for more frequent exposure are better served by crafting smart, brief pre-roll messaging for placement with online video content men enjoy: humorous/prank/spoof videos, full-length entertainment and videos featuring attractive women.

Sigh. The more things change…

(Photo of random Guitar Hero dude from Flickr).

Well-meaning friends ask me why I don’t get a scooter. I don’t want a car, I take the subway and walk. In LA, this is madness, apparently, and yes, it makes some things awkward. To some, the bicycle I want is not real transporation. Real transporation involves an engine that goes vroom. And scooters are cute! Like sixties Italy!

But I think in LA, a scooter is more dangerous than any other vehicle. You’re explosed, with no factory-manufactured exoskeleton. On a similarly vulnerable motorcycle, you’re at least traveling at the same height as people in cars, and you can move faster than they do. On a bike, you can veer away from dangerous traffic onto sidewalks if need be. On a scooter, no matter how cute you are, you still have to travel with big cars that are faster than you, whose drivers can’t see you well, and that can cause tremendous damage.

Or, maybe you smash into a tree.

DeWayne McKinney, who spent nearly two decades in prison for an Orange County murder he insisted he did not commit and went on to start a multi-million dollar business in the Hawaiian islands, was killed this morning in a scooter accident in Honolulu, authorities said today.

McKinney made national news in 2000 after Orange County Dist. Atty. Tony Rackauckas obtained his release from prison, saying he’d been wrongly convicted of a 1980 robbery-murder at a Burger King in Orange.

The 47-year-old McKinney crashed into a wooden light pole at about 12:30 a.m. and was thrown onto the pavement, said Caroline Sluyter, a spokeswoman for the Honolulu Police Department. McKinney, who was not wearing a helmet, died at a local hospital.

McKinney had parlayed a $1-million legal settlement with the Orange Police Department into a multi-million dollar ATM business on the Hawaiian islands and had been in discussions with movie studio executives about turning his life story into a feature film.

In the years after his release from prison, McKinney spoke frequently at anti-death penalty conferences. Prosecutors originally sought the death penalty for McKinney, but instead he was sentenced to life in prison without parole after jurors deadlocked in the penalty portion of his trial.

When he was released from prison in January 2000, McKinney was forced to start his life from scratch. He didn’t have a driver’s license, Social Security number, savings or a place to live. Initially, he settled in Orange County, working at UC Irvine as an audio-visual technician and living for free in an apartment funded by a local businesswoman….

At the time of his death, McKinney owned 42 ATMs on three Hawaiian islands and had a net worth of more than $6 million, said Carl Stein, who owned a company that processed transactions for McKinney.

“To spend 19 years in prison and get out and do what he did, it was amazing,” Stein said. “He had this way with people. They just couldn’t say no to him.”

“He really appreciated life in a way that most people can’t because of all the time he lost,” Rawitz said. “He laughed easily. He made friends easily and he appreciated every day he lived.”

Too bad he also rode a scooter.

© 2010 carolyn kellogg Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha