Archive for the 'andetc' Category

Distracted from John Irving

paperhaus November 3rd, 2009

I could have sworn I had another week. But I bought the ticket to see John Irving and never put the details in my calendar, so when he was across town being interviewed I was sitting cozily at home, reading. Clueless.

Perhaps I was slightly distracted by my fabulous orchid. When the American Orchid Society held its conference in town recently, my dad, who’s a judge, came into town (I managed to get his flight info into my calendar) and showed me around. He helped me buy some orchids that should be happy in the LA weather, including this one. I love its crazy spidery blossoms, which opened up during a sweltering day. I don’t know its name.

And I feel like I should — my family is given to taxonomy. My grandmother kept an Audubon book or two next to a set of binoculars near her picture window, to figure out exactly what each bird was. Naming the bird was as vital as watching the bird. So, too, walks through the woods would involve the names of trees, of bushes, of creeping vines. I can tell you how to distinguish Poison Ivy (shiny leaves that come off the stem in threes), although I suppose anyone who went to summer camp can do that, too. But anyway, I feel like I ought to know the names of things, like this orchid, but all I can do is show it to you.

don’t tell anybody, but I’m wearing the same jeans as yesterday

paperhaus July 29th, 2009

You’d think with my varied responsibilities that I could get away with wearing the same pair of jeans without encountering any of the same people two days in a row. But not today; I’m heading to the same office as yesterday, and the pants, the pants they are the same.

This used to make me crazy, crazy enough to fill closets with pants and skirts. In fact, I have lots of eligible skirts, but they’re all wrinkled, because I don’t have quite enough skirt hangers, and while the ironing board is now set up right in the middle of the living room I haven’t quite gotten around to using it, other than as a resting place for clean laundry. I could buy more jeans, if I could make more time, if I didn’t bail from shopping errands when parking becomes a drag, if I really just cared more about the jeans and the skirts and the clothes, which I did used to care about. Like I said, it made me crazy, once.

Because when I was 13, the absolute worst age for a girl to have to wear the same pair of jeans two days in a row, I didn’t have enough pants and skirts to make it through the week. Although then it was pants, really — I wore pants: the skirts weren’t cute until high school. Then, I only had 4 pairs of pants, which meant I had to recycle one pair during the week, which took lots of planning as it was 8th grade and some classes met every day and others didn’t, so then it wasn’t so much that no one would see the doubled-up pair of pants as simply minimizing the exposure without repeating the pattern enough to get noticed, because getting noticed for something like not enough pants in 8th grade would have been just about the worst thing ever, other than all those other worst things ever, which there was, honestly, a really long paradeful of when I was 13.

Did I mention that, of my 4 pairs of pants, one was bright yellow?

This was of course my own doing. Like a crow, I am drawn to the shiny. But when faced with an inadequate supply of pants, a BRIGHT YELLOW pair is an added complication.

Today, my jeans are not yellow. But it’s possible they’re coming off. Maybe there’s something clean that I overlooked — time to go check the ironing board.

busy busy busy

paperhaus July 28th, 2009

My sister blew into town last week for my birthday (she’s the taller, blonder one) and we did much walking around LA, particularly from one happy hour to the next. That’s the Edison behind us, which was not my favorite of the downtown bars we visited, but which did have the cheapest drinks — early on Thursdays, you can get the house cocktail for 35 cents.

In non-birthday, non-drinking news, I talked to the Irish Independent (more on authors coming back from the grave) and to the Guardian again, this time about the former husband of Elizabeth Eat Pray Love Gilbert getting a book deal for his story about finding himself after the end of their relationship. I do wish his story was something like whoring and brawling and turning into a slovenly, porn-watching bachelor, but it sounds like he traveled the world to find his spiritual center. Ah well.

I turned in a book review at the LA Times. I’m building a website for a literary agent. I went to the Getty last week — not to work, which I often do — but to eat and drink like a Roman.

Book review and quotage

paperhaus July 13th, 2009

My review of Jonathan Ames’ The Double Life is Twice As Good is in today’s LA Times books pages. The book is not so great, and I couldn’t help but think that his publisher wanted to have an Ames collection on shelves which included the story “Bored to Death” by the time the HBO series based on it (starring Jason Schwatrzman) premieres this fall. Not only to the pieces fail to say much of anything, but old diary entries and an email are included — filler-style odds and ends. I wish the book had been great; Ames generously gave me an interview when I was a struggling podcaster, and was very kind, too. Such is the sucky job of a critic, though: you’ve got to be critical.

On another note, I got to talk about works-after-death for an article that appears in today’s Observer. There’s a major upcoming release by Nabakov (the long-secreted The Original of Laura), a re-do of Hemingway’s A Movable Feast, and a few others, including Graham Greene’s first (unfinished) novel. The Strand Magazine gave Jacket Copy a peek at Graham Greene’s effort — sort of an Agatha Christie knock-off — and I got to chime in about what the dead-guy-book pile-on means.

The view from there

paperhaus July 5th, 2009

The fourth of July BBQ I could walk to was too good to pass up. At not quite two miles away, and up a dusty trail through a park, many Angelenos would not consider this walkable, but I was determined. When it came to picking out shoes, I wavered, and I was not super-cutely attired — indeed, I was sweaty and winded — when I arrived, but there you go. I’d walked.

Of course, I mooched a ride home.

But before that it was a lovely BBQ, with lots of food and drink and 3 year-olds the size of 5 year-olds careening around, not at all in control of their ever-growing limbs. We sat on a large patio, watching the sun go down and sparks of fireworks rise up along the horizon.

Where I live, I am hemmed in with no view, but it’s easy enough to find one if you hike up a steep hill.

I’d been there once before, at this home of a longtime acquaintance, when it was full of stuff. Yesterday the stuff was there but pushed away, tidied, and I took the time to appreciate the off-kilter rectangle-ness of the space, the wall of windows, the studio-type floor, the rock fireplace and short rock wall with a square velvet couch that seemed built for its spot, a bedroom that was a just a nook with a wide open wall to the rest of the space. There was another part of the house I hadn’t seen, a roommate, a kitchen, but I stood there thinking that this was the way to do it right, to create the open space and the windows over the trees and the big wide patio and the space to work in. I just kind of stood there taking it in.

The place is really great, I told my longtime acquaintance, who was cranking the windows open, or shut. How did you find it? Well, someone they knew was working on a Schindler documentary, and there was this house…

This is a Schindler house? I asked.

Yes, they said.

Oh, I didn’t say. Wow, I didn’t say. I was just quiet, which for me is saying both those things, really.

I thought of other places of sublime, out-of-reach beauty. Like Frank Lloyd Wright’s Falling Water, or those Newport mansions I grew up close to, or the houses in Malibu I drove past on Thursday. Every time I’d seen one of those places I’d imagined what it would be like to live in them, to have that as the texture of your life, every day. How the physical space would be a like a gift that would secretly inform your actions, even when you stopped noticing it, if you could ever stop noticing it.

And here I was, in a place like this not as a museum but as a place where someone — not rich — lived for real, who made potato salad and drank tequila. I felt fortunate to have used this bathroom and seen this view and done ordinary things like help string the christmas lights and neglect to carry food back to the kitchen. I could have driven someplace else and I would have missed it; but yesterday, the sublimity of that Schindler house was the texture of my life, too.

Nietzche in the morning

paperhaus July 1st, 2009

Shortly after getting up I checked my Twitter feed — a weakness, to be sure — and saw that Alain de Botton was Tweeting quotes about anger. Here’s one:

Angry people call poverty on themselves and ruin on their homes, denying they are angry, just as the mad deny their insanity, Seneca -De Ira

de Botton — who is @alaindebotton, if you’re curious — had recently left an angry comment on the blog of Caleb Crain, who (negatively) reviewed de Botton’s book “The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work” in the NY Times. “You have now killed my book in the United States, nothing short of that,” de Botton wrote. “So that’s two years of work down the drain in one miserable 900 word review…. I will hate you till the day I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make. I will be watching with interest and schadenfreude.”

Which is heated, if not nasty. And it doesn’t fit with the Alain de Botton I saw at the Getty in LA just a few weeks ago, who came across as sweet and patient. He stood for hours on a chilly patio in order to speak to every person who wanted a book signed; it was a long queue at the end of his book tour, but he never got frustrated or exasperated.

So he’s either good at fronting, or Crain really pissed him off.

I’m inclined to think the latter, and I’m glad that de Botton said what he said. Not that I hate the review, am convinced this is de Botton’s best work or am even sure that he’s right about the damage done — but I think expressing anger is OK. Don’t like the review — say something! Such reactions shouldn’t leave reviewers cowering, but get them up on their feet, shouting their opinions, their reasons, their refusals to submit!

There is some kind of play-nice mentality going around that I’m not sure I believe in. Maybe we’ve lost our ability to argue without getting personal, or the skill of expressing anger with eloquence. I think that’s why de Botton was pulling what 140-character quotes he could about anger’s place in our lives.

That said, I’m not sure that going to Nietzche on how to live is ever a good idea.

The emotions of envy, hatred and lust are life-conditioning emotions which must essentially be present in every life - Nietzsche

It’s not untrue, but it feels uneasy, unresolved. Nietzche is good for some things — he’s always thought provoking, if not infuriating — but his ego-driven, brittle intellect didn’t make him much of a life coach.

A preamble of sorts

paperhaus June 30th, 2009

I’ve been puzzled by exactly what to do here on my personal blog. I used to write about books, but now I write about books on Jacket Copy. I write a second blog for the LA Times, which is kind of technology-green-hipster-culture, which covers a lot of stuff of other than books. And I do some other work that, when I began, I was asked not to discuss online.

So if I’m not writing about books (which I love), or contemporary culture (which I like), or the other stuff I’m doing (which is mine), what do I write about? Since I Twitter, what’s the point of blogging, anyway?

Some people use blogs to vent bile. Throw mud. I’m torn. Do I throw mud back at the person who threw it at me last week? Do I point out inaccuracies, exaggerations, and reveal the short and rather pathetic backstory?

Meh.

I will tell you this: in my new rental, which is sandwiched between an apartment building full of gang kids and one of LA’s most beautiful residential streets, I can hear birds singing in the morning, and have tried to to save a fledgling from the neighborhood cats.

People came over to see this new place this weekend. It’s like you, they said. But my last place — a tall 1920s brick apartment building with a chilly pool and a bar on the ground floor was like me, too.

I think I’ve fooled them into thinking any place is like me by filling them all full of books.

Currently reading: a book for review & Jonathan Lethem’s Chronic City for fun.

Keeping busy

paperhaus January 26th, 2009

The Southern California chapter of the Mystery Writers of America invited me and Kassia Krozier and Lise Friedman, field rep for Macmillan, to talk about the future of publishing at a brunch today. Denise Hamilton, our moderator, steered us toward talking about how authors can navigate the world of new media, which was a little more manageable than trying to predict the future. Although on that front, Kassia was all pro-ebook and I was pro-paper, in case you were wondering. Everyone was awfully nice, and the brunch, at The Smoke House, a 1940s-era restaurant that I was sadly ignorant of (such is my unfamiliarity with the Valley), was entirely delicious, if you skipped the sushi.

While I was getting a churro and dipping strawberries in the chocolate fountain, Andrew Sullivan found a post of mine on Jacket Copy that struck a chord. Thanks for the link, big guy.

What twitter is, this moment

paperhaus December 4th, 2008

Being on twitter right now feels like passing notes in the class of life.

I’m sure someone else has already said that.

And it won’t stay that way for long. I mention Mad Men and hours later Betty Draper is following me. Betty? If I have to be followed by a television character, could we make it Don Draper, please?

This should be a picture of Etgar Keret

paperhaus November 3rd, 2008

On Thursday night I went to see Ben Ehrenriech and Etgar Keret at the LA Public Library’s ALOUD series. They were in conversation with the topic, “Is reality overrated”? Easy to answer in a month when stock markets around the world have tanked, yadda yadda. Surreality, it was easily agreed, is much better.

“The times are very difficult to live in, but easy to write about.” That was Keret. I think he was quoting, or paraphrasing someone. But he said many insightful and funny things of his own. Describing overly-perfect art versus messy genius, he described Bob Dylan’s voice as that of “a choking crow” — but you’d still rather hear it than an American Idol contestant’s pitch-perfect cover.

Someone asked Keret a question that I sounded pretty dumb: since he’d written about suicide (his story “Kneller’s Happy Campers” was the basis for the film Wristcutters), did he have any personal experience with it? Geez, I thought, fiction means it’s made up. But I was wrong.

“My best friend killed himself during Army service,” Keret said. People who know his biography have probably heard this before, but it was news to me. They’d stay up late nights talking about life and whether it was worth living, then his friend decided it wasn’t. “Writing for me,” Keret said, “is the answer for why I’m living.”

I did take pictures. But I can’t find the cable that connects my camera to my computer.

Instead of Etgar Keret and Ben Ehrenreich, I’ve got a picture above of an orchid in my father’s Florida greenhouse. I can never remember which is what — this one might be a paphiopedalum. If it isn’t, it’s a good word, anwyay: Paphiopedalum.

Good words. Reasons for living.

Next »