<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap judgments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carolynkellogg.com/2008/04/snap-judgments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carolynkellogg.com/2008/04/snap-judgments/</link>
	<description>and Pinky's Paperhaus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:15:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Wilson</title>
		<link>http://carolynkellogg.com/2008/04/snap-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-3253</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkyspaperhaus.com/?p=694#comment-3253</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I would have run it if I had assigned it, principally because the last thing you want is to have all reviews in a section reflect the outlook of the editor. In the end , it just comes down to one reviewer&#039;s opinion, whether that reviewer is a Pulitzer winner or just plain Joe Schmoe. The great thing about the blogosphere is that reviews can be challenged openly and widely. At least this is a great thing if you favor free and open discussion about books. If you prefer the former gated community of opinion, then I guess it&#039;s not so great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I would have run it if I had assigned it, principally because the last thing you want is to have all reviews in a section reflect the outlook of the editor. In the end , it just comes down to one reviewer&#8217;s opinion, whether that reviewer is a Pulitzer winner or just plain Joe Schmoe. The great thing about the blogosphere is that reviews can be challenged openly and widely. At least this is a great thing if you favor free and open discussion about books. If you prefer the former gated community of opinion, then I guess it&#8217;s not so great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

