<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear NYTBR: Grammar, please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carolynkellogg.com/2007/07/dear-nytbr-grammar-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carolynkellogg.com/2007/07/dear-nytbr-grammar-please/</link>
	<description>and Pinky's Paperhaus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:15:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; Roundup</title>
		<link>http://carolynkellogg.com/2007/07/dear-nytbr-grammar-please/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkyspaperhaus.com/?p=523#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>[...] everyone is excited about Catherine Texier&#8217;s David Markson review. As Carolyn rightly points out, NYTBR grammar often leaves much to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] everyone is excited about Catherine Texier&#8217;s David Markson review. As Carolyn rightly points out, NYTBR grammar often leaves much to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://carolynkellogg.com/2007/07/dear-nytbr-grammar-please/comment-page-1/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkyspaperhaus.com/?p=523#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>On top of all of that, the first sentence used the word &quot;novel&quot; twice (excluding the one in the title) despite its claim that the book isn&#039;t a novel at all. Bad writing, and inexcusable coming from the purported beacon of the literary establishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On top of all of that, the first sentence used the word &#8220;novel&#8221; twice (excluding the one in the title) despite its claim that the book isn&#8217;t a novel at all. Bad writing, and inexcusable coming from the purported beacon of the literary establishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

